Mogami Gold Studio 25 Microphone Cable Quad Conductor 25 feet
Pay on Delivery (Cash/Card) eligible
What is this?
Pay on Delivery (POD) includes Cash on Delivery (COD) as well as Debit card / Credit card / Net banking payments at your doorstep.
- Most accurate cable available - Highest cancellation of hum and noise - Ultra high-density spiral shield keeps noise out, maintains high frequency performance - Top quality gold contact XLR connectors - Lifetime warranty
Customers who bought this item also bought
Have a question?
Find answers in product info, Q&As, reviews
Please make sure that you've entered a valid question. You can edit your question or post anyway.
XLR Male to XLR Female microphone cable. Nearly every top recording studio is wired with Mogami cable. It is famous for neutral tone and dead quiet background. Gold Studio cables continue that tradition by combining the best Mogami Neglex Quad conductor cable, protected by Mogamis exclusive ultra-high density, 100% coverage spiral copper shield: The best combination of sound quality and noise rejection. Best of the best gold contact connectors, backed by a lifetime warranty. Made with 2534 cable.
|5 star (0%)|
|4 star (0%)|
|3 star (0%)|
|2 star (0%)|
|1 star (0%)|
Most helpful customer reviews on Amazon.com
In the process of converting my studio to better cables, as a degreed EE I look at specifications; in particular, capacitance per foot, which can cause a (somewhat minor but audible) rolloff effect in the top of the treble range, particularly with higher impedance preamps. This quad cable (Mogami 2534) has significantly higher capacitance per foot (worse) than their non-Quad (2549) product, but slightly lower capacitance (better) than the competing, also very high quality Canare Quad. Quad cables trade capacitance for interference immunity - they are very quiet indeed.
I have found that if a mic or source is "active" (48 VDC phantom powered mic, active DI, or an electronic instrument output), it typically does not need the super high interference rejection of a quad cable, but can still benefit from lower capacitance. I use Mogami 2549 (non-quad) for those sources. Dynamic (non-powered) mics are more interference sensitive, and benefit more from a quad cable, as do longer runs (25 foot+) from active devices, particularly lower level ones. I use Mogami 2534 Quad (this cable) for those applications, and combat the capacitance rise by keeping cable lengths as short as possible.
I do agree this is one of the last things you should be spending your money on. Wait util your cable quality is the main thing holding you back from better sound.